Detecting Hot Spots While Accounting for False Negatives

Background

There will be occasions when it is necessary to determine with a specified high probability that no hot spots of a specified size and shape exist in the study area. A hot spot is a local contiguous area that has concentrations that exceed a threshold value. Initially, the conceptual site model should be developed and used to hypothesize where hot spots are most likely to be present. If no hot spots are found by sampling at the most likely locations, then VSP can be used to set up a systematic square, rectangular or triangular sampling grid to search for hot spots. Samples or measurements are made at the nodes of the systematic grid. The VSP user specifies the size and shape of the hot spot of concern, the available funds for collecting and measuring samples, the false negative rate, and the desired probability of finding a hot spot of critical size and shape. Only circular hot spots can be specified.

For quantitative samples, the false negative rate is the probability that a sample measurement indicates that contamination is below the acceptable threshold, when, in fact, it is at the threshold. For presence/absence measurements, the false negative rate is the probability the sample does not detect contamination when it is present.

Objectives of the VSP Hot Spot Design Module

The VSP user can direct VSP to compute one or more of the following outputs:

The method used in VSP to achieve these sampling objectives is described in Sego and Wilson (2007), which builds upon the approach developed by Singer and Wickman (1969). Gilbert (1987) also discussed hot spot sampling design. Additional information is provided in the summary report of the design that VSP automatically generates.

Assumptions that Underlie the VSP Hot Spot Design Method

1. The shape of the hot spot of concern is circular.

2. The level of contamination that defines a hot spot is well defined.

3. The location of the hot spot is unknown, and if a hot spot is present, all locations within the sampling area are equally likely to contain the hot spot.

4. Samples are taken on a square, rectangular or triangular grid pattern.

5. Each sample is collected, handled, measured or inspected using approved methods that yield unbiased and sufficiently precise measurements.

6. A very small proportion of the surface being studied will be sampled (the sample is much smaller than the hot spot of interest).

7. Sample locations are independent of the measurement process.

8. The systematic grid is placed at a randomly determined starting place to cover the surface area of interest.

9. There are no false positives (a clean area is not mistakenly identified as a hot spot).

10. The false negative error rate is known and is the same for all measurements.

References:

Gilbert, R.O. 1987. Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring. Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.

Sego, L.H. and J.E. Wilson. 2007. Accounting for False Negatives in Hot Spot Detection. PNNL-16812. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, August 2007. http://www.pnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-16812.pdf

Singer, D.A. and J.E. Wickman. 1969. Probability Tables for Locating Elliptical Targets with Square, Rectangular, and Hexagonal Point Nets. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania. Special Publication 1-69.

The Hot Spot Test dialog contains the following controls:

Locating a Hot Spot page:

Solve for:

Grid Spacing / # of Samples / Total Cost button

Probability of Hit button

Hot Spot Size button

Input:

Grid Spacing button

Number of Samples button

Number of Samples edit box

Total Cost button

Total Cost edit box

Probability of Hit

False Negative Error Rate

Grid page:

Grid Type:

Square

Triangular

Rectangular

Length of grid side

Length units

Width / Height Ratio

Random Start

Hot Spot page:

Area of Hot Spot button

Hot Spot Area edit box

Area Units drop list

Length of Radius button

Radius edit box

Length Units drop list

Cost page